the public

President Mikhail Saakashvili

Visit by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden to Tbilisi widely commented on by the American media and was regarded by them as a sign of support for Saakashvili's White House. "Tbilisi is greeted by Vice President Joe Biden as a hero, and President Mikhail Saakashvili made the call to the West prochuvstvenny to help protect his country from the Russian forces stationed in the separatist territories "- wrote The New York Times. Biden's problem in Georgia is to persuade Tbilisi to unchanged Washington's support, without causing anger and resentment in Russia. Biden's visit became a sort of political triumph for Mr. Saakashvili, because, despite the numerous political miscalculations and a gradual decline confidence in the West, Georgia, as yet, the leader once again managed to secure support from Washington. On the eve of the visit of U.S. Vice President Saakashvili "suggested" the series of democratic reforms, including the use of direct mayoral elections next year and "promise" to provide the opposition National Broadcasting cable TV channel.

Also among the proposed reforms – a new limitation of presidential powers and strengthening of the independence ships. All this, in terms of The Washington Post, is aimed at restoring the shattered reputation of the President of Georgia before the arrival of Joe Biden, who was going, and then emphasized the concerns of the U.S. retreat from Saakashvili democracy. If George W. Bush at the Georgian leader's pro-Western reformer, was seen as, after last year's defeat in the war with Russia, he became the target of criticism at home and abroad.

People Democracy

Especially the transition to a permanent (eternal) life is inevitable, as the collapse of capitalism. The future of society can only be deeply democratic, or no, so why put off then on what you can start doing right now. The so-called democratic western society, as well as the fact that trying to implement in Russia has nothing to do with this, real democracy. Our democracy figuratively called dermokratizmom and not without reason. The concepts of communism, capitalism, socialism, in the minds of most people, discredited and cause negative emotions and associations, so I propose to call the future model of social organization – social and abandon these isms. Defined with some definitions to avoid confusion and to what is being said (taken from wikipedia).

Democracy (Greek "people power") – political regime of the state or a political system in which power is exercised through direct democracy (direct democracy) or through representatives elected by the people, or some part of the people (Representative democracy). The main feature of democracy is to ensure proportional representation in the power of the widest possible interests of the people present in the country, as well as dynamic change of representative government, along with corresponding changes in those interests over time. Political power – the ability of one person or group of persons to control the behavior of citizens in a society based on national or national tasks. Direct democracy (direct democracy) – forma political organization of society in which major decisions are made directly by citizens; direct exercise of power by the people at the national and local levels, various forms of decision-making by the people of the general and local character; direct lawmaking people.


Power and people are forced from desperation to coexist, being careful not to disturb each other to live, having concluded a tacit social contract. Contradiction, of course, affected, but they are not antagonistic, and the maximum of their manifestation can be described by the term "mutual irritation. " Each party wants to "grab" for himself, as they say, "his blood" to provide for their own benefit from the public domain. But while it is limited to appeals for respect, so-called "Social behavior". In Uralsk, for example, neither the authorities nor the common people do not stop to eat fish, sturgeon poaching on both sides there is widespread, but so far these differences are limited defiantly open fishing elite and the "underground", but much more widespread poaching simple local population with a great historical experience of the "theft" red fish "the king's table." Except Moreover, for a modern, intelligent, successful, sociable young generation who wants to live a decent life, but after many unsuccessful and unsuccessful attempts to build a European society in Kazakhstan, disappointed in Thus, there are two ways out of this situation. The most "advanced" and not deprived of property under section nationwide, just go to the West and influence the ongoing processes of post-Soviet space, they can only indirectly, and are not discussed in this article. Others in this category of people who do not have the initial capital, create their own individual world, which nepodvlasten Kazakh reality. From the state needed only a minimum of restrictions, the relative safety, lack of periodic bans travel abroad, free Internet access, etc.